gearbox for B18FT

For those of you not faint of heart, who believe the Volvo 480 should have more torque and horsepower, find all you need to know in here.

Moderators: jifflemon, coyote1980, Rachel

Post Reply
mnich
480 Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 6:43 am
Location: Warsaw/Poland

gearbox for B18FT

Post by mnich » Sat Nov 29, 2008 4:52 pm

I've heard that it might be a good idea to use for B18FT a gearbox from the 1.7 non-turbo engine. it is shorter and enables better acceleration. has anyone of you heard about that or tried such solution?
regards!
mnich

User avatar
JohnTurbo
Friend of Club 480 Europe
Posts: 4135
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: Fixin' Engines NR Burnley
Contact:

Post by JohnTurbo » Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:14 pm

Thats true, it would increase acceleration for the 10 mins it took to break ;)
Past:
94 Turbo - Red
94 Turbo - Black (Converted from NA 2.0)
92 Turbo - Red
90 Turbo - Silver
Now:
00 Exige
15 GKD Legend
16 Skoda Superb

User avatar
Sieger
Started learning about 480
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:04 am

Post by Sieger » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:02 pm

a gearbox from a Reno 5, gtt or clio 16 v or megan 2ltr can also be used. i'm using a 5 GTT box without any probs.
Renault 5 GTT *volvo 480 turbo power*

161 BHP & 230 Nm @ 10 Psi -->Now running on 18 Psi :P

soon --> new engine in with 315cc injectors t25/28 turbo an BIGMOD :)

User avatar
bkf_uk
480 Rookie
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Yate nr bristol (uk)

Post by bkf_uk » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:10 pm

From what i have been told by most (not all but the majority) renault conversion guys is use the original turbo box. most of the r5gtt users ditch there box for the volvo one as it is stronger.

I have the auto box and with a rich mod have managed to shear 2 driveshafts now from too much torque (now gone to solid driveshafts instead of the hollow ones), think of the effort involved with doing that and the fact the autobox is less rugged than the turbo manual box. i doubt very much that a standard 1.7 / 1.8 box will live for long without the syncros giving in. if you must go for a n\a box go 2.0 as that engine was the most powerful n\a.

but from what i can see the minor diffrence in gear ratios isnt going to make that much diffrence?
Toys:-
2001 Ford focus (not as much fun as my volvo was!)
94 440 turbo auto (Sent to the main dealer in the sky :cryhard: )
92 Suzuki gn250 (Still in rebuild)

Iroll480
Can tell where the 480 was built
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:33 am

Post by Iroll480 » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:32 pm

The M59 is the box to go for. It's the strengthend version of the M-line. The M60 is the box which is fitted on the B20F. The ratios of the 1st and 2th are shorter because the torque of that engine lies higher up the revs. The higher gears are rated the same on these boxes.
The M59 uses needle bearings on the most stress full places instead of ballbearings which are used in the rest of the range. The housing is also strengthened on some points.

Post Reply